Related Papers
Prince et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act (2023) 20:144 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y RESEARCH Open Access © Crown 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the mate- rial. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity
2023 •
Christina Vietinghoff
The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners).
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Adopting an evidence-based lifestyle physical activity program: dissemination study design and methods
2011 •
Gary Cutter
Health Promotion International
Integrating research evidence and physical activity policy making--REPOPA project
2015 •
Susan Roelofs, Liliana Cori, Ien Am Goor, adriana valente, T. Skovgaard, Mette Winge Jakobsen, N. Loncarevic, Gabriel Gulis, H. Spitters
Health Research Policy and Systems
Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
2016 •
Riitta-Maija Hämäläinen
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Stakeholder involvement in the design of a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial of the “On the Move” group exercise program in community-dwelling older adults
2016 •
Edmund Ricci
Design and implementation of an online Delphi study to develop indicators for evidence‐informed policy making
2016 •
Valentina Tudisca
This report describes a Delphi study conducted within the European FP7 project REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA), whose main objective is fostering evidence-informed policy making in the field of health and physical activity. The Delphi study was designed and implemented for improving and integrating a draft list of indicators for evidence-informed policy making developed by REPOPA researchers to assess the use of evidence in policy processes, organized in thematic sets. The Delphi study involved 76 policy makers and researchers from six European countries – Italy, Romania, Denmark, Finland, United Kingdom and The Netherlands – and was conducted in two rounds consisting of online questionnaires. Preliminary results about the effect of the Delphi on the original indicators are reported.
Sustainability and Health are Integral Goals for the Built Environment
2006 •
Vivian Loftness
Evaluation and Program Planning
The Delphi process as a tool for decision making
1993 •
Simon Hakim
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity
2021 •
Leslie Meehan
Background: Built environment approaches to promoting physical activity can provide economic value to communities. How best to assess this value is uncertain. This study engaged experts to identify a set of key economic indicators useful for evaluation, research, and public health practice. Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary group of experts participated in (1) one of 5 discussion groups (n = 21 experts), (2) a 2-day facilitated workshop (n = 19 experts), and/or (3) online surveys (n = 16 experts). Results: Experts identified 73 economic indicators, then used a 5-point scale to rate them on 3 properties: measurement quality, feasibility of use by a community, and influence on community decision making. Twenty-four indicators were highly rated (≥3.9 on all properties). The 10 highest-rated “key” indicators were walkability score, residential vacancy rate, housing affordability, property tax revenue, retail sales per square foot, number of small businesses, ...
Sports Medicine
Improving Current Practice in Reviews of the Built Environment and Physical Activity
2014 •
Jim Sallis
